The holographic principle suggests that information in a volume of space can be encoded on its boundary. Popular metaphors describe the universe as a cosmic projection, akin to a 3D film from a 2D screen.
Effect: This framing invites a naïve material interpretation: reality is “just an image” or “emerges” from something more fundamental, privileging an inaccessible boundary as ontologically primary. It obscures that holography is a symbolic mapping between representations, not a literal projection mechanism.
Relational Reframe: Holography encodes relations between degrees of freedom across descriptive frameworks. The “boundary” is a computational or symbolic cut, not a hidden layer of reality. The principle is a perspectival tool for alignment, not a metaphysical claim.
Takeaway: Holography is about symbolic correspondence, not cinematic creation. Misreading it as literal projection leads to an ontological trap, seducing us into thinking we inhabit a shadow of something “more real.”
No comments:
Post a Comment